Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-2923-c2609831592@github.com>
From: "davecramer (@davecramer)" <noreply+davecramer@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 13:37:15 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] PR #2923: un-deprecate SSL_FACTORY_ARG
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-2923@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-2923@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: davecramer
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 2609831592
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Issue: 2923
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/2923#issuecomment-2609831592
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Same argument is valid. It's not the correct way to express "this is a sensitive api"