Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3220-c2100594906@github.com>
From: "davecramer (@davecramer)" <noreply+davecramer@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 13:36:01 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] PR #3220:  setTimestamp use timestamptz db type
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3220@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3220@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: davecramer
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 2100594906
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Issue: 3220
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/3220#issuecomment-2100594906
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

> > How is this different than #2715 ?
> 
> If I understand the patch correctly, that is more about the returned meta data type and not about parameter set.

in which case these PR's should be combined.