Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3280-c2629541990@github.com>
From: "davecramer (@davecramer)" <noreply+davecramer@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2025 20:25:07 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] PR #3280: WIP Asynchronous ResultSetHandler
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3280@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3280@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: davecramer
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 2629541990
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Issue: 3280
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/3280#issuecomment-2629541990
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

I don't think it's necessary to use NIO, if you read this patch you can see we are just getting data in a background thread. That was the plan