Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3435-c2464274799@github.com>
From: "davecramer (@davecramer)" <noreply+davecramer@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 09:54:13 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3435: it's better to just switch to NIO and SocketChannel?
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3435@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3435@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: davecramer
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 2464274799
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Issue: 3435
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/3435#issuecomment-2464274799
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Possibly. I have a PR https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/3280 which attempts to use asynch I/O. I'd be all for asynch I/O. Care to work on it ?