Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3467-c2565033732@github.com>
From: "ldhasson (@ldhasson)" <noreply+ldhasson@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 05:12:22 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3467: DatabaseMetaData.getIndexInfo() doesn't return "REMARKS" property
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3467@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3467@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: ldhasson
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 2565033732
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Issue: 3467
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/3467#issuecomment-2565033732
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Ok. Your previous message seemed to imply this would not be part of the JDBC metadata and so one should use the alternate query.

It would be nice to have this covered in an upcoming release. Seems like it would be a low-impact addition/fix.


Thank you,
Laurent Hasson


________________________________
From: Shanay Shah ***@***.***>
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2024 23:12
To: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
Cc: ***@***.***; Author
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] DatabaseMetaData.getIndexInfo() doesn't return "REMARKS" property (Issue #3467)


Yes of course this should be supported at the JDBC level

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/3467#issuecomment-2565006997>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADEHB25V2RIN27UHZQNFOD2IDB4LAVCNFSM6AAAAABUB2ZFOGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKNRVGAYDMOJZG4>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>