Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3483-c2598002399@github.com>
From: "vlsi (@vlsi)" <noreply+vlsi@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 10:45:57 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3483: Support adaptive fetching without enforcing memory limits, and/or have a separate buffer size for it
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3483@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3483@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: vlsi
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 2598002399
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Issue: 3483
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/3483#issuecomment-2598002399
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

> We should add this to protocol nice to have list

As to me, it does not look like a protocol change though. It looks like a more-or-less safe change that should be compatible with the existing clients.