Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3568-rc2035856811@github.com>
From: "vlsi (@vlsi)" <noreply+vlsi@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 17:53:07 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] PR #3568: use pgType instead of internal name to preserve the schema
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3568@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3568@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: vlsi
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 2035856811
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: review_comment
X-GitHub-Commit: fdef48c6ec57cd9217d8cefacbe7e60cd230b1e6
X-GitHub-Issue: 3568
X-GitHub-Line: 548
X-GitHub-Path: pgjdbc/src/main/java/org/postgresql/jdbc/TypeInfoCache.java
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: review_comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/3568#discussion_r2035856811
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

(on pgjdbc/src/main/java/org/postgresql/jdbc/TypeInfoCache.java:548)

What is the reason to put a truncated type name into the cache?

If someone calls the function with a full name like `"public"."typename"`, then it would always end up with `getOidStatement` which is unwanted.