pgjdbc/pgjdbc GitHub issues and pull requests (mirror)
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: praiskup (@praiskup) <[email protected]>
To: pgjdbc/pgjdbc <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3591: The Fedora CI seems to fail
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:10:56 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
> From my view the best solution would be to refer to actual Fedora .spec files for each version of Fedora.
:shrug: this used to work just fine for us (downstream) & upstream back then when I was part of the maintenance team @ Fedora. But feel free to fix the CI the way you prefer. Or we can drop it, if you do not need it.
Just note that it is rather long-shot for upstream contributors to fix Fedora spec files just to make the upstream CI green (IOW, if we use one spec file from Fedora centrally - upstream contributors can not fix problems they are causing).
> In the template file I already see some relicts of ancient times and I am surprised other errors were not shown.
Yes, there used to be very verbose comment both sides trying to inform the future maintainers that these files should stay in sync.
view thread (7+ messages)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: github://pgjdbc/pgjdbc
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3591: The Fedora CI seems to fail
In-Reply-To: <<[email protected]>>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox