Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3592-rc2045844648@github.com>
From: "davecramer (@davecramer)" <noreply+davecramer@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 01:45:06 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] PR #3592:  Handle protocol 3.2 and wider cancel keys. 
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3592-rc2045227628@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3592@github.com> <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3592-rc2045227628@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: davecramer
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 2045844648
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: review_comment
X-GitHub-Commit: 4b3dc4a9751cec4747dac8261db56d31ebfe1165
X-GitHub-Issue: 3592
X-GitHub-Line: 181
X-GitHub-Path: pgjdbc/src/main/java/org/postgresql/core/v3/QueryExecutorImpl.java
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: review_comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/3592#discussion_r2045844648
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

(on pgjdbc/src/main/java/org/postgresql/core/v3/QueryExecutorImpl.java:181)

I don't think so, the API is pretty much internal. That said we will see.