Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3608-c2813526967@github.com>
From: "victornoel (@victornoel)" <noreply+victornoel@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 16:45:22 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3608: Support BigInteger[] in PgPreparedStatement#setObject(int, java.lang.Object)
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3608@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3608@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: victornoel
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 2813526967
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Issue: 3608
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/3608#issuecomment-2813526967
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Hello @davecramer , I am indeed aware of that but I was wondering if we could get support for more of the typical Java types like it is already the case for String[], Long[] or as already mentioned BigDecimal[] in setObject().

I of course understand if this is too much out of the scope of the project.