Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3700-c3344193723@github.com>
From: "soumava (@soumava)" <noreply+soumava@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2025 19:48:51 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] PR #3700: Add PEMKeyManager to handle PEM based certs and keys.
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3700@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3700@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: soumava
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 3344193723
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Issue: 3700
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/3700#issuecomment-3344193723
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Thanks for the PR @harinath001. I'm hoping we can start using PEM formatted certificates with PGJDBC soon! 

Are we waiting for any further reviews/approvals for this PR? cc @davecramer @vlsi if not, is there a preferred alternative approach to be implementing this?