Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3724-c3051687932@github.com>
From: "vlsi (@vlsi)" <noreply+vlsi@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 08:33:37 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3724: Regression: FATAL:  simple query "BEGIN" arrived before ending an extended query message
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3724@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3724@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: vlsi
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 3051687932
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Issue: 3724
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/3724#issuecomment-3051687932
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Here's the commit: https://github.com/pgpool/pgpool2/commit/240c668d120065534b1d298d6facc86839fcbab9*

I think the issue duplicates https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/3107, so it is not like a "regression from 42.7.5 to 45.7.7", but it sounds like a long-standing "simple vs extended queries vs sync" issue to me, which probably surfaced by using `pgpool2 + pgjdbc autosave`.