Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3757-c3177139390@github.com>
From: "rlbdv (@rlbdv)" <noreply+rlbdv@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 23:03:47 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3757: PreparedStatement.toString() fails for bytea parameters with at least 42.7.7
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3757@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3757@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: rlbdv
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 3177139390
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Edited-At: 2025-08-11T23:03:57Z
X-GitHub-Issue: 3757
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/3757#issuecomment-3177139390
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

I was wondering if we could work around the regression without too much difficulty by just switching to `setBytes()`, but didn't see how we might handle a prepared statement parameter that's an array of bytea values without "bytea" PGobjects, offhand.