pgjdbc/pgjdbc GitHub issues and pull requests (mirror)
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: sehrope (@sehrope) <[email protected]>
To: pgjdbc/pgjdbc <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] PR #3895: implement require_auth, this is pretty much how libpq does this.
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 19:32:18 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
(on pgjdbc/src/main/java/org/postgresql/core/v3/ConnectionFactoryImpl.java)
Why are we doing it with bit masks rather than throwing the allowed / disallowed in a `Set<string>(...)` and calling `.has(...)`?
We have to do the mapping from the FEBE code to a name once and then can use that for the check. It's not like this happening in some tight loop. It'd be a single check for the whole connection handshake right?
view thread (42+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: github://pgjdbc/pgjdbc
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] PR #3895: implement require_auth, this is pretty much how libpq does this.
In-Reply-To: <<[email protected]>>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox