Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3904-c3719601258@github.com>
From: "sehrope (@sehrope)" <noreply+sehrope@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 16:06:31 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3904: Should this be protected with a reentrant lock?
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3904@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3904@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: sehrope
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 3719601258
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Issue: 3904
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/3904#issuecomment-3719601258
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Is there any expectation or guarantee that `LargeObject` is thread safe?

Outside of a couple explicit things like closing connections, assumption should be that nothing is thread safe in the driver. This is an odd one though as the body of that function interacts via both fastpath and directly to the connection.