Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3904-c3719608172@github.com>
From: "davecramer (@davecramer)" <noreply+davecramer@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 16:08:16 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3904: Should this be protected with a reentrant lock?
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3904@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-3904@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: davecramer
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 3719608172
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Issue: 3904
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/3904#issuecomment-3719608172
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

> Is there any expectation or guarantee that `LargeObject` is thread safe?
No, but it's strange that the we keep status in there and that we don't guard the status.

I figure it doesn't hurt anything.