Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-4075-c4498225305@github.com>
From: "vlsi (@vlsi)" <noreply+vlsi@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 12:07:47 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] PR #4075: docs: restructure site, compatibility page, changelog-driven releases
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-4075@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-4075@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: vlsi
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 4498225305
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Issue: 4075
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/4075#issuecomment-4498225305
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

A couple of things:

1. On reading the docs: yes — I cross-reviewed the prose with a second LLM that pulled project sources to fact-check, and I read the security, authentication, compatibility, and troubleshooting pages line by line. I have not read every line of every page in this PR myself. If you suspect a specific page or passage, name it and I'll go through it with you.
2. On the form of the PR: if size is the blocker for your review, I'd rather know that directly than negotiate format — no objection if you'd rather pass on this one. Concrete suggestions remain welcome any time.