Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-4075-c4518592057@github.com>
From: "vlsi (@vlsi)" <noreply+vlsi@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 12:21:27 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] PR #4075: docs: restructure site, compatibility page, changelog-driven releases
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-4075@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-4075@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: vlsi
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 4518592057
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Issue: 4075
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/4075#issuecomment-4518592057
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

> The question is why American ? I intentionally used English instead of American

Well, there was a comment: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/4075#discussion_r3284626796

> davecramer: British spelling "organised" — most of the rest of the docs use American English ("behavior", "analyze"). This page also uses "catalogue" further down. Consider normalizing to one dialect across all pages.

I inferred "most of the rest of the docs use American" as if it was the preferred way.

I've normalized the spellings to British in c76d90e2dc61df08467c9b1b69d9bd3a0bcb9867. No hard feelings, either way works for me.