pgjdbc/pgjdbc GitHub issues and pull requests (mirror)
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: davecramer (@davecramer) <[email protected]>
To: pgjdbc/pgjdbc <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] PR #4075: docs: restructure site, compatibility page, changelog-driven releases
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 16:09:20 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Yeah, I agree that you should create a new PR
Dave Cramer
On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 9:04 AM Sehrope Sarkuni ***@***.***>
wrote:
> *sehrope* left a comment (pgjdbc/pgjdbc#4075)
> <https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/4075#issuecomment-4520356020;
>
> I'd strongly suggest we close this PR so that whatever is going to be
> reviewed stands on its own. The rest of the commentary in this thread is
> not relevant and would only be distracting.
>
> I'd also suggest getting feedback and acceptance on new code additions
> (e.g., the enum stuff and it's code processor to generate docs) before
> going down a rabbit hole of building and running it. That way you don't
> feel like been a waste of time if the idea itself is shot down.
>
> Finally, if you're going to present this as something for others to
> review, get rid of the sausage factory of LLM commits and structure it into
> logical chunks that you would expect from a human. I don't care if you use
> AI to write code. But I'm not going to step through 100+ "phase 1a:
> refactor the flubber thingamabob" with multi paragraph meaningless commit
> messages. You need to squash it down to something presentable before
> opening a PR. This dump everything on reviewers approach is not going to
> work.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/4075#issuecomment-4520356020;, or
> unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADDH5VPNM3BLAQXFKSV7J344B3BHAVCNFSM6AAAAACZAMWTQS...;
> .
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
view thread (64+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: github://pgjdbc/pgjdbc
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] PR #4075: docs: restructure site, compatibility page, changelog-driven releases
In-Reply-To: <<[email protected]>>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox