Message-ID: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-538-c202342148@github.com>
From: "davecramer (@davecramer)" <noreply+davecramer@github.com>
To: "pgjdbc/pgjdbc" <noreply+pgjdbc-pgjdbc@github.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 11:06:37 +0000
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #538: Why getSchemaName return empty string or exists getBaseSchemaName and getColumnName return getColumnLabel?
In-Reply-To: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-538@github.com>
References: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc-538@github.com>
List-Id: <gh-pgjdbc-pgjdbc.github.com>
X-GitHub-Author-Login: davecramer
X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 202342148
X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment
X-GitHub-Issue: 538
X-GitHub-Repo: pgjdbc/pgjdbc
X-GitHub-Type: comment
X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/538#issuecomment-202342148
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Well I am still concerned what this is going to break. For some reason the
old code didn't do this.

Dave Cramer

On 28 March 2016 at 03:14, Artur Geraschenko notifications@github.com
wrote:

> Yes, of course, I am happy to do it.
> 
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/538#issuecomment-202275709