Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <pgpool-general-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1vjBY8-009vt4-1w
	for pgpool-general@arkaria.postgresql.org;
	Fri, 23 Jan 2026 07:25:45 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <pgpool-general-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1vjBY6-00Gb7R-2L
	for pgpool-general@arkaria.postgresql.org;
	Fri, 23 Jan 2026 07:25:43 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <ishii@postgresql.org>)
	id 1vjBY6-00Gb7I-1L
	for pgpool-general@lists.postgresql.org;
	Fri, 23 Jan 2026 07:25:42 +0000
Received: from meldrar.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::31])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <ishii@postgresql.org>)
	id 1vjBY3-001tQZ-0Q
	for pgpool-general@lists.postgresql.org;
	Fri, 23 Jan 2026 07:25:41 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=postgresql.org; s=20171124; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:
	Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Cc:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender
	:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description;
	bh=YZj8SAl1Q7VBnFROp57wy7cR5MBRSt4VB5718IWm6J4=; b=rMbl/u32SxlOk+GLkicKErfrgq
	zcpuOIk+tcPDE6Vep1srqSvRdYaPIE7STPMpsRnFvmr+iBN2Yo5TFLekfUwz3FAFwi59MnoH5rHY0
	1TULbvY45St/ecLWzdloxAonLbiGWHQpRaHDK2WMN95ZSzHcGhqTAhCctixj9b0CDaZOK3gQ9b1xX
	2qpc1/fOlz+ZvnEIQffNXBSHW4SCTr5QVmZ3Zk2E4tHcDs04h2xtEtKhJ8XWq6n8DzGF3lUXyalG9
	e3LVYaVXaYtass9bEx07n61Atp+jnk9NiwuDyvcVtG4448Dw80gXfb/vnZw9UmkP66uBXTVcjZl/I
	hmck5u3Q==;
Received: from 117.141.178.217.shared.user.transix.jp ([217.178.141.117]
 helo=localhost)
	by meldrar.postgresql.org with esmtpsa  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <ishii@postgresql.org>)
	id 1vjBXy-004IRy-1G;
	Fri, 23 Jan 2026 07:25:37 +0000
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 16:25:26 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20260123.162526.1291014725918553616.ishii@postgresql.org>
To: emond.papegaaij@gmail.com
Cc: pgpool-general@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Pgpool-II 4.7.0 released.
From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <20260123.133510.1195841695338539350.ishii@postgresql.org>
References: <20260122.093003.1821723338788147775.ishii@postgresql.org>
	<CAGXsc+Yg8Y2xxPDtNNYekNvG+ABtzb9GtxuwrbfrBDMJXGVX9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20260123.133510.1195841695338539350.ishii@postgresql.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 29.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: <pgpool-general.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgpool-general@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgpool-general-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgpool-general>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20260123.162526.1291014725918553616.ishii%40postgresql.org>
Precedence: bulk

> Ok, so we will have following 4 new params?
> 
> wd_listen_addresses
> wd_listen_port
> wd_heartbeat_listen_addresses
> wd_heartbeat_listen_port

After thinking more, I feel like it would be overkill to allow to
specify multiple IPs for wd_listen_addresses and
wd_heartbeat_listen_addresses.

If so, we can decide to allow only 1 IP for each parameter and change
the names to:

wd_listen_address
wd_heartbeat_listen_address

What do you think?

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp