MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAGXsc+ZmBoLs3Mz=G-Bdm4JJG+fH1NpHfR3qVJVwW4eBKWwStQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20260519.214037.579991005061650329.ishii@postgresql.org>
 <20260519.215552.499378691092618823.ishii@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <20260519.215552.499378691092618823.ishii@postgresql.org>
From: Emond Papegaaij <emond.papegaaij@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 15:25:24 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAGXsc+ZYoA6gicaXLyzpzUyY9Dr7+wZ069eJVzBOoFJiNBUoSw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Primary node detection race at clean startup
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
Cc: pgpool-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAGXsc%2BZYoA6gicaXLyzpzUyY9Dr7%2BwZ069eJVzBOoFJiNBUoSw%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

> Done.

Thanks!

> Note that the credits section in the commit message is as follows:
>
> Reported-by: Emond Papegaaij <emond.papegaaij@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Claude Code
> Author: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAGXsc%2BZmBoLs3Mz%3DG-Bdm4JJG%2BfH1NpHfR3qVJVwW4eBKWwStQ%40mail.gmail.com
> Backpatch-through: v4.3
>
> You are credited as a reporter, and Claude Code is also a reporter to
> indicate that the report was created by AI. I credited myself as the
> author. This is by following reasons:
>
> 1) AI cannot be the author.
> 2) The committer (me) is responsible for the commit.

Yes, that makes perfect sense. By default Claude adds a
'Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context)
<noreply@anthropic.com>'. I totally agree that as a human, you are
responsible for the final commit. AI is a very powerful tool, but it's
still just a tool. At our company, we have a very simple rule: ask
yourself if you're proud of the work you've created. If you're not,
then don't commit.

Best regards,
Emond