Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1buPmJ-00047T-C1 for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:05:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1buPmH-00055g-HV for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:05:25 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1buPmG-00053q-Im for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:05:24 +0000 Received: from mail-vk0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1buPmD-0001N4-DP for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:05:24 +0000 Received: by mail-vk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id q126so3266647vkd.2 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:05:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :thread-index:content-language; bh=RhGka/T+q8fz4QEyVlwHhWgPePYSwAblrH2vt/ucwfg=; b=ws6pgHCLd0D7OpifBRhFqySRR5beccgtKsDXIb0mjpi4QZbQEPSUQCUSp+MX/0K8yO QsRvl5qWkWVgmkWfOC05+5jQEyvGsPNOaTVQxG6EqTtKKlWF5f8Jo77Rr6E0eRD6rX0b aYchArKUcWxlymzfJEaeMoDFxOrflNi1hHh2ApcH6xeME0I6kOBiWsQ2DUdhBMHlP5ra yvEmXO1vFyAIw1C/1h6T9D2lV70hIaNkCPQrnQbAeb99wplYimsjEGiLRyQHouKgSEo3 lKBOo7Bu4o4b2nh8ouy4osA4rOsrJJYhfTXmMyC0UZzF4JnVNp5NedEr8Ay3RzrHkL9F ckCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=RhGka/T+q8fz4QEyVlwHhWgPePYSwAblrH2vt/ucwfg=; b=bM5itXe/ZRyJvJrPg1ESTslOhRoe1bIU1XhX7vzfeA/3FWbDH3cp2goJD6QONpGH7S LNu0vcC12QH7yFhR1GnzrK1z1HgJQYm5gu+MK+gQntNaLHpfWlKLm2aURBeyA5Lx9Usp xja++Q83sS6dxySHu8PBZV97w1vhne6OWlxwVIz2oOxfwJFzP+ASSYcTHeapaGoi1cvx 4zSU4bARHbPgh+mnmhx7bzZDnnxgsS+QJSp60ndlNppG/eARWiQRuyBQ39DxeFsDIt4h 3G2wej5aEsiTYID4P5suMWO4wlfUhGTfVo4fq13gpOHwq7OTzQcEXYOQakDU+1lVnqeB w6aQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnxPAe0zd0yJUO/7hStyirxT/5lUHzMD/LAV2RMC1ioUysWG62eXQE9mUthuohrXA== X-Received: by 10.31.182.71 with SMTP id g68mr1831028vkf.135.1476302719070; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lazaro ([200.55.161.75]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o15sm3695022vkd.21.2016.10.12.13.04.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:05:03 -0700 (PDT) From: "Lazaro Garcia" To: "'Ravi Tammineni'" , References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Is Bi-Directional Replication (BDR) is fully integrated into PostgreSQL 9.6 or 9.7? Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:04:11 -0400 Message-ID: <000201d224c3$eae58a20$c0b09e60$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_01D224A2.63D522A0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQMTjXnH8Y/uPJ6m6gs0wZvVsStWYp4ibApA Content-Language: es X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01D224A2.63D522A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hasta donde tengo entendido BDR se iba a incluir como parte de una = extensi=F3n de PostgreSQL en 9.6 pero no s=E9 si finalmente se logr=F3. =20 Saludos. =20 De: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org] En nombre de Ravi Tammineni Enviado el: mi=E9rcoles, 12 de octubre de 2016 3:04 Para: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Asunto: [ADMIN] Is Bi-Directional Replication (BDR) is fully integrated = into PostgreSQL 9.6 or 9.7? =20 Hi, =20 We are planning to setup BDR (from 2ndQuadrant) for one of our critical production environment. Anyone has any idea what is the support from Postgres going forward? Will it be fully integrated into PostgreSQL 9.7? Last year someone mentioned that it will be integrated in 9.6 but seems = like it never happened.=20 =20 Currently we are using Postgres 9.4 version binaries from 2ndQuadrant. = But our development wants to upgrade the database to 9.6/9.7 based on BDR availability.=20 =20 Thanks ravi ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01D224A2.63D522A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hasta donde tengo = entendido BDR se iba a incluir como parte de una extensi=F3n de = PostgreSQL en 9.6 pero no s=E9 si finalmente se = logr=F3.

 

Saludos.

 

De: = pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org = [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org] En nombre de Ravi = Tammineni
Enviado el: mi=E9rcoles, 12 de octubre de 2016 = 3:04
Para: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Asunto: = [ADMIN] Is Bi-Directional Replication (BDR) is fully integrated into = PostgreSQL 9.6 or 9.7?

 

Hi,

 

We are = planning to setup BDR (from 2ndQuadrant) for one of our critical = production environment. Anyone has any idea what is the support from = Postgres going forward? Will it be fully integrated into PostgreSQL 9.7? = Last year someone mentioned that it will be integrated in 9.6 but seems = like it never happened.

 

Currently = we are using Postgres 9.4 version binaries from 2ndQuadrant. But our = development wants to upgrade the database to 9.6/9.7 based on BDR = availability.

 

Thanks

ravi

------=_NextPart_000_0003_01D224A2.63D522A0--