Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0F11337B55 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:02:47 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10780-01; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 12:02:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com (mail-yx0-f174.google.com [209.85.213.174]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789AD1337B47; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:02:39 -0400 (AST) Received: by yxt3 with SMTP id 3so3522722yxt.19 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 04:02:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.50.6 with SMTP id x6mr1397081ybx.18.1291291358525; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 04:02:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from ANIBALVAIO ([190.128.222.90]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n48sm271540yha.7.2010.12.02.04.02.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 02 Dec 2010 04:02:37 -0800 (PST) From: "Anibal David Acosta" To: =?utf-8?Q?'Rados=C5=82aw_Smogura'?= , "'Craig Ringer'" Cc: , References: <007101cb917a$cadbc830$60935890$@devshock.com> <4CF7520A.3030808@postnewspapers.com.au> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [GENERAL] How to recover a postgres installation from files Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 09:02:40 -0300 Message-ID: <000a01cb9218$d3d01150$7b7033f0$@devshock.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQFee/gcoLz11AIYIfoZzOAYFzTkggISEKf1AXIV1N6USxgg8A== Content-Language: es-py X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.599 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, FSL_RU_URL=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201012/24 X-Sequence-Number: 36253 Thanks!!! I'll download right now :) -----Mensaje original----- De: Rados=C5=82aw Smogura [mailto:rsmogura@softperience.eu]=20 Enviado el: jueves, 02 de diciembre de 2010 08:22 a.m. Para: Craig Ringer CC: Anibal David Acosta; pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; = pgsql-general@postgresql.org Asunto: Re: [GENERAL] How to recover a postgres installation from files ftp://svimik.servehttp.com/soft/postgresql-8.1.4-1-binaries-no-installer.= zip ftp://po.istu.ru/public/distrib/Windows/Devel/db/postgresql/postgresql-8.= 1.5-1.zip ftp://ftp.lviv.farlep.net/opensource/DataBases/postgresql-8.1.2-1.zip ftp://svimik.servehttp.com/soft/postgresql-8.1.4-1.zip ftp://isyrkov.dialup.corbina.ru/Soft/SQL/PostgreSQL-8.1.3-1.zip ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/Databases/PostgreSQL/Win32/postgresql-8.1.1-1.z= ip ftp://ftp.lviv.farlep.net/opensource/DataBases/postgresql-8.1.2-1.zip I found this on 8 server over world, even archie didn't helped. I'm = really (negatively) suppressed how simple is to delete something from Internet. = I thought it will be simpler to find in internet any old soft. If = something like this will happen with GCC? Remember to keep copy original DB files, to don't destroy it. -- ---------- Rados=C5=82aw Smogura http://www.softperience.eu On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 16:00:10 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: > On 02/12/10 01:11, Anibal David Acosta wrote: >=20 >> So, I only have the postgres directory on my hands. I decide to = install >> the >> same database version in another computer and replace DATA directory, >> but I >> notice that 8.1 (windows binary) is not available for download. >>=20 >> So, I don't know how to recover the database from the data directory = of a >> windows postgres 8.1 installation. >=20 > First and most important: only work on a COPY of the recovered files. > Keep an original, untouched copy somewhere read-only and safe. >=20 > My other mail should provide you with some info on how to get 8.1 . > Hopefully Magnus or someone else will provide a better source of 8.1 > installer binaries, but if not then the ones I linked to may be a = viable > option. >=20 >=20 > BTW, 8.1 was EOL'd in 2007: >=20 > http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.865 >=20 > Once you get your data accessible, do a full dump IMMEDIATELY; you = need > to upgrade to a supported version of PostgreSQL before resuming using > the database. 8.1 is not only old, but pretty unsafe on Windows. If = your > organization has had it around this long after EOL, you need to look = at > your software management policies. >=20 >=20 > Not that I can throw stones - I have: >=20 > Windows NT 4 [1996, final eol in 2004] > Sybase SQL Anywhere 5.5 [1995, eol 2002] > SCO OpenServer 5.0.5 [1995, eol 2004, company no longer exists*] > Plain English 4GL [?, eol 1983, company gone by 1985**] > Microsoft Office Word 2000 > Mac OS 9.2.2 (PowerPC G4) with an Apple Desktop Bus hardware dongle > Windows 98 (running in a VM; runs a win16 app with 16-bit ODBC) >=20 > here among other scary dinosaurs I can't yet get rid of for one reason > or another. >=20 > * There's someone wearing their name and their skin, but it's not = really > SCO (the Santa Cruz Operation). The SCO Group are peddling the old > versions of the OS with minimal engineering support and knowledge. = About > the only interesting thing they've done is repacked OpenServer 6 into = a > canned VM image with a couple of drivers, because it was a bit > tempramental to install on many VM systems. >=20 > ** This runs in the Microsoft Xenix kernel personality on the SCO > OpenServer box. SCO 5.0.5 is the *newest* OS it'll run on. And no, I > don't have source code or I would've ported it to something civilized > long ago. The app it runs relies too much on freaky bugs and quirks in > the interpreter for a reimplementation to be viable; I know, I tried. = A > rewrite of the app Plain English runs is in progress... >=20 > --=20 > System & Network Administrator > POST Newspapers