Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70F6632D2A for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:45:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61494-09 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:45:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from ns3b.twi.com.br (ns3b.twi.com.br [201.87.225.54]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3270632CE0 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:45:50 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 5248 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2010 20:44:12 -0300 Received: from unknown (HELO gibon) (gibon@comexsystem.com.br@[201.21.98.184]) (envelope-sender ) by ns3b.twi.com.br (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 25 Aug 2010 20:44:12 -0300 Message-ID: <002401cb44af$a22f5e50$6500a8c0@gibon> Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E1bio_Gibon_-_Comex_System?= From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E1bio_Gibon_-_Comex_System?= To: "Scott Marlowe" Cc: "PostgreSQL - mailing list" References: <004a01cb43f9$ffb46040$6500a8c0@gibon> Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 x Win 2008 - slow connection Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:45:26 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.461 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.439 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201008/229 X-Sequence-Number: 35478 Thanks a lot... i will check this too. Fábio Gibon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Marlowe" To: "Fábio Gibon - Comex System" Cc: "PostgreSQL - mailing list" Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 6:47 PM Subject: Re: [ADMIN] PostgreSQL 8.4 x Win 2008 - slow connection On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Fábio Gibon - Comex System wrote: > I'm having problems with connection time using Post 8.4 on Win 2008 > enterprise (32bits). To do open/close 10 connections i lost about 20 > seconds > and doing the same test using Post 8.4 in another server (Win 2003) on 20 > seconds i get (open/close) almost 500 connections. The difference is very > very large. Somebody did have any problem like this? Also, look into the QoS settings for the network stack. Those have produced problems before for pgsql. -- To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion. -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin