Received: from mail.rdc1.sdca.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.sdca.home.com [24.0.3.66]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA17960 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 00:51:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jconway2@home.com) Received: from JEC-NT1 ([24.0.42.111]) by mail.rdc1.sdca.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with SMTP id <20000405045112.EXTF11969.mail.rdc1.sdca.home.com@JEC-NT1> for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 21:51:12 -0700 Received: by JEC-NT1 with Microsoft Mail id <01BF9E7F.E867DFA0@JEC-NT1>; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 21:51:18 -0700 Message-ID: <01BF9E7F.E867DFA0@JEC-NT1> From: Joe Conway To: "'pgsql-admin@postgresql.org'" Subject: performance Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 21:51:17 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.org id AAA18007 X-Archive-Number: 200004/8 Hello, I'm currently working with a development database, PostgreSQL 6.5.2 on RedHat 6.1 Linux. There is one fairly large table (currently ~ 1.3 million rows) which will continue to grow at about 500k rows per week (I'm considering various options to periodically archive or reduce the collected data). Is there anything I can do to cache some or all of this table in memory in order to speed queries against it? The physical file is about 130 MB. The server is a dual Pentium Pro 200 with 512 MB of RAM. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Joe Conway p.s. I tried to search the archives, but it did not return any results with even the simplest of searches.