Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665DF1337BA5 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:17:32 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92873-05 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:17:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:05:02.397856 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87851337BB0 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:17:24 -0400 (AST) Received: from Duality (174-29-75-73.hlrn.qwest.net [174.29.75.73]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Lrf0f-1QF6EV2Ldt-013pQX; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:12:15 -0500 From: "mark" To: Subject: PG 9 OpenLDAP 2.4 dependency ? (in a jam) Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:12:10 -0700 Message-ID: <01e301cbca41$1de0d530$59a27f90$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 thread-index: AcvKQRraC6FmpsuUTZykHVnFcSJD4g== Content-Language: en-us x-cr-hashedpuzzle: CEzS CMaU CqMO Du1S DwLL Dzuz EDUx FP9x FUNd F4Gu HXyH Hcxg H4hx H4uu I75p Kamm; 1; cABnAHMAcQBsAC0AYQBkAG0AaQBuAEAAcABvAHMAdABnAHIAZQBzAHEAbAAuAG8AcgBnAA==; Sosha1_v1; 7; {92DF64A1-9B15-4E58-B421-29749F4036D1}; bQBhAHIAawBAAHMAbQAtAGEALgBuAGUAdAA=; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:12:08 GMT; UABHACAAOQAgAE8AcABlAG4ATABEAEEAUAAgADIALgA0ACAAZABlAHAAZQBuAGQAZQBuAGMAeQAgACAAPwAgACgAaQBuACAAYQAgAGoAYQBtACkA x-cr-puzzleid: {92DF64A1-9B15-4E58-B421-29749F4036D1} X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:sfSf8zMuymlA1fJrleoSu9bxX3VBgu3q0ilrAjc3Nbd utFJTstJJnb97WYxOoHyv94tSx3qcth1YWuRjAwftfNdtBMIit w7A6KaDGFXQy6ILcF2VrZ3aB1I419s+LgE62+MHM//v+7EKMJg PJhMeHYwFwj8gG1+7LaNVSotrOceZ4zMNYTOWe0BFz1ALtmuf1 /Wm4EtU/iHY+9mLjBF86A== X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201102/92 X-Sequence-Number: 36731 Is this true ? I am having trouble finding the documentation on this. Thanks for someone with better google-foo than me if they can find it, and maybe why? I have an LDAP master running 2.3.(something) on a box and it is looking like getting that to 2.4 is a no-go. Postgres does not auth with that LDAP instance. Thanks Mark