Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D404664FC21 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:26:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02381-04 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:26:41 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1A364FC1E for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:26:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m8OKQdNm010863; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:26:40 -0400 (EDT) To: "BJ Taylor" cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: missing chunk number 0 for toast value In-reply-to: <3d78fcfd0809241132y14a832cai8b32bc32e936699e@mail.gmail.com> References: <3d78fcfd0809241132y14a832cai8b32bc32e936699e@mail.gmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to "BJ Taylor" message dated "Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:32:12 -0600" Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:26:39 -0400 Message-ID: <10862.1222287999@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200809/293 X-Sequence-Number: 30386 "BJ Taylor" writes: > Our database seems to have been corrupted. It is a heavily used database, > and went several months without any type of vacuuming. When we finally > realized that it wasn't being vacuumed, we started the process, but the > process never successfully completed, and our database has never been the > same since. What PG version is this? Exactly what do you mean by "never successfully completed"? regards, tom lane