X-Original-To: pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A3FD1B174 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 17:35:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21397-10 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:35:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cmailm2.svr.pol.co.uk (cmailm2.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.193.210]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A60CD1B173 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 17:35:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from modem-3416.lynx.dialup.pol.co.uk ([217.135.205.88] helo=[192.168.0.102]) by cmailm2.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BoTF3-0004on-II; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:35:37 +0100 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery From: Simon Riggs To: Mark Kirkwood Cc: Tom Lane , pgsql-admin@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <41005639.9040107@coretech.co.nz> References: <200407132242.i6DMgg612564@candle.pha.pa.us> <1089760416.17493.3327.camel@stromboli> <40F49AE9.2060805@familyhealth.com.au> <1089789682.17493.3890.camel@stromboli> <40FF1D88.30404@coretech.co.nz> <12173.1090527593@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1090540113.3057.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41005639.9040107@coretech.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: 2nd Quadrant Message-Id: <1090701310.3057.118.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:35:10 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200407/279 X-Sequence-Number: 14347 On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 01:05, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > I have tested the "cold" backup - and retested my previous scenarios > using "hot" backup (just to be sure) . They all work AFAICS! > cheers Yes, I'll drink to that! Thanks for your help. Best Regards, Simon Riggs