Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A47665016F for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:37:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73535-07 for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:37:02 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from orion.asenkron.com (orion.asenkron.com [64.15.152.21]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A601065008C for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:37:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by orion.asenkron.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5305DBD000A; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 20:33:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at orion.asenkron.com Received: from orion.asenkron.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (orion.asenkron.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O1SwSBrpNi5E; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 23:33:56 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [192.168.2.2] (unknown [88.224.25.168]) by orion.asenkron.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E5A85BD0007; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 23:33:53 +0300 (EEST) Subject: Re: pgCluster and PostgreSQL From: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= To: DANIEL CRISTIAN CRUZ Cc: PostgreSQL Admin In-Reply-To: <9f18500d24eb758774d21ef9bf97eabd@intranet.sc.senai.br> References: <9f18500d24eb758774d21ef9bf97eabd@intranet.sc.senai.br> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-yj8+PIL65VWQjhRBd/JO" Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:59:31 +0300 Message-Id: <1218895171.3316.6.camel@laptop.gunduz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.854 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.854 X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200808/71 X-Sequence-Number: 29916 --=-yj8+PIL65VWQjhRBd/JO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 16:55 -0300, DANIEL CRISTIAN CRUZ wrote: > I was looking at PostgreSQL docs, and didn't found any reference about > a merge of PostgreSQL. A long time ago I saw somenthig about this. No, PgCluster will never merge with PostgreSQL Core. PgCluster is not mature enough to be added to the core, and also PG Core team does not want to add such solutions to core (which I like very much). -HTH --=20 Devrim G=C3=9CND=C3=9CZ devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org --=-yj8+PIL65VWQjhRBd/JO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkim3UIACgkQtl86P3SPfQ7hwACfS5Mg6CG5zbEHTOPBy27AK/1Q hSEAnipUGrSS9OuL1oDy6VEwWC8eMik8 =aKrc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-yj8+PIL65VWQjhRBd/JO--