Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wen9S-0004oP-W3 for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:07:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wen9S-00037Z-5h for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:07:26 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:7903:4::125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wen9R-00037T-Bc for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:07:25 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wen9O-0005LS-Gu for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:07:24 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s3SF7Mcr012665; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 11:07:22 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Ray Stell cc: "pgsql-admin@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: 9.0.15 WAL mis-replay status? In-reply-to: <8D8B1117-25D3-4C82-9FB5-6CE5C8E2C3EC@vt.edu> References: <8D8B1117-25D3-4C82-9FB5-6CE5C8E2C3EC@vt.edu> Comments: In-reply-to Ray Stell message dated "Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:18:28 -0400" Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 11:07:22 -0400 Message-ID: <12664.1398697642@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org Ray Stell writes: > I finally got permission to patch a highly used db from 9.0.15 to .17. Is there any way to know if the WAL replay issue has effected the standby? I don't have the reported bloat, is that THE test? Is there any way to measure the current state of this issue listed in the 9.0.16 release notes: > Fix possible mis-replay of WAL records when some segments of a relation aren't full size (Greg Stark, Tom Lane) TBH, I'd suggest re-syncing the standby after you upgrade. Obvious bloat is one symptom, but only one symptom. Note however that the issue could only arise on tables that exceed 1GB, so depending on your usage, maybe you don't have a problem. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin