Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE85A632E29 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 14:24:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92383-01 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 17:24:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from spinlock.commandprompt.com (host-215.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.215]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9489632482 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 14:24:35 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spinlock.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF55B348034; Tue, 11 May 2010 10:24:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at commandprompt.com Received: from spinlock.commandprompt.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spinlock.commandprompt.com.commandprompt.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cN6nzFtS0JnL; Tue, 11 May 2010 10:24:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (190-95-21-86.bk17-dsl.surnet.cl [190.95.21.86]) by spinlock.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A03C348002; Tue, 11 May 2010 10:24:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7BD236E4C5; Tue, 11 May 2010 13:24:30 -0400 (CLT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Bruce Momjian , Simon Riggs , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: List traffic From: Alvaro Herrera To: Marc G. Fournier In-reply-to: References: <201005111350.o4BDo4x27597@momjian.us> Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 13:24:30 -0400 Message-Id: <1273598624-sup-3654@alvh.no-ip.org> User-Agent: Sup/0.11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.001 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_20=-0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201005/544 X-Sequence-Number: 162207 Excerpts from Marc G. Fournier's message of mar may 11 09:58:34 -0400 2010: > If list traffic, especially on -hackers, is getting so large, should we > look at maybe splitting it? I could easily enough split things such that > I duplicate the subscriber list, so nobody would have to subscribe, but it > would make it easier for ppl to filter their incoming ... ? Maybe we could create a separate list where people would send patches, and keep patchless discussion on -hackers? Just a thought ;-) --