Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D636322C4 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:07:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48585-01 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:07:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from spinlock.commandprompt.com (host-215.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.215]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B5D63253E for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:07:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spinlock.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26592348013; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:07:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at commandprompt.com Received: from spinlock.commandprompt.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spinlock.commandprompt.com.commandprompt.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vI6z+dT+Y4q0; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:07:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (200-126-90-175.bk6-dsl.surnet.cl [200.126.90.175]) by spinlock.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59D59348011; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:07:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9C3116E4BE; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:07:31 -0400 (CLT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: [ADMIN] Subject: Re: General migration question From: Alvaro Herrera To: Greg Spiegelberg In-reply-to: References: Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:07:31 -0400 Message-Id: <1283266911-sup-617@alvh.no-ip.org> User-Agent: Sup/git Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201008/282 X-Sequence-Number: 35531 Excerpts from Greg Spiegelberg's message of mar ago 31 09:04:18 -0400 2010: > Probably questions best asked on hackers but I figure many are represented here. > Will there ever be a release where a dump-restore is not necessary? > Perhaps, at least, minor releases (e.g. 9.0 to 9.1) will not require a > dump-restore? 9.0 to 9.1 is not a minor release. 9.0.0 to 9.0.1 is a minor release, and this doesn't require a dump/reload, but it also doesn't have any new features. 9.0 to 9.1 is just as major as 8.4 to 9.0 is. (The rule is: a change in second digit is major release, a change in first digit is marketing pressure) You can upgrade in place using pg_upgrade from 8.4 to 9.0 (thus you don't need dump/reload). In general, it will be possible to migrate from one major version to the next with pg_upgrade starting with the 8.4-to-9.0 jump. -- Álvaro Herrera The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support