Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93138B5DC16
	for <pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:12:44 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 61835-07 for
	<pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 15 Sep 2011 23:12:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0-rc2
Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FE7B5DBF0
	for <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:12:37 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com)
	by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <marvin.deoliveira@gmail.com>) id 1R4L6i-0001i2-Kx
	for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:12:36 -0700
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: "marvin.deoliveira" <marvin.deoliveira@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Message-ID: <1316128356637-4808758.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAP=oouFe_t5V43pJ194WM+ZgDZ5ySuWWyx8eDro-7hLFaya23A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1316125973378-4808653.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<CAP=oouFe_t5V43pJ194WM+ZgDZ5ySuWWyx8eDro-7hLFaya23A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RESTORE IS TO SLOW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.767 tagged_above=-10 required=5
	tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL=0.01,
	URI_HEX=1.122
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201109/106
X-Sequence-Number: 38343

I'm using postgres 9.0.2 32 bits on Debian 5.
The hardware is a pc with 2 GB RAM, with 2 sata disks. Well, that's what I
have at the moment.

The restore was started like:  pg_restore -U postgres --data-only
--disable-triggers -v /bck/<dump file>.sql -d <database>
The pg_restore shows:
pg_restore: disabling triggers for <table name>
pg_restore: restoring data for table "<table name>"  <- that's taking more
time that I'd like.
pg_restore: enabling triggers for <table name>

I've read the posts that you send, and saw a lot of things that I didn't do.
I'm pretty sure that I'm going to have much better performance after change
the parameters.
But I still have a doubt: Droping the indexes, could give me more
performance?


-----
Marcos Oliveira
And I still haven't found what I'm looking for...
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/RESTORE-IS-TO-SLOW-tp4808653p4808758.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - admin mailing list archive at Nabble.com.