Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([98.129.198.125])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <parkiratbagga@gmail.com>) id 1TOaLy-00050c-U7
	for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 20:36:35 +0000
Received: from sam.nabble.com ([216.139.236.26])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <parkiratbagga@gmail.com>) id 1TOaLu-0005Ec-8X
	for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 20:36:34 +0000
Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com)
	by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <parkiratbagga@gmail.com>) id 1TOaLt-0000rJ-VV
	for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:36:29 -0700
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Parkirat Bagga <parkiratbagga@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Message-ID: <1350506189966-5728705.post@n5.nabble.com>
Subject: WAL corruption while replication
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Pg-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Archive-Number: 201210/62
X-Sequence-Number: 40178

Hi,

How to recover, if master postgres WAL got corrupted before it is applied to
the standby server?

Will I loose all the data present in the WAL segment?

How can I partially apply the WAL?

Regards,
Parkirat Singh Bagga. 



--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/WAL-corruption-while-replication-tp5728705.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - admin mailing list archive at Nabble.com.