Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([98.129.198.125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TOb3T-0005xf-Gn for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 21:21:31 +0000 Received: from sam.nabble.com ([216.139.236.26]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TOb3R-0005sI-RE for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 21:21:30 +0000 Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TOb3Q-0004Rv-S4 for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:21:28 -0700 Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:21:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Parkirat Bagga To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Message-ID: <1350508888862-5728713.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1350506045391-5728704.post@n5.nabble.com> <1350507684535-5728709.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Streaming Replication (Master Delta Sync) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Archive-Number: 201210/67 X-Sequence-Number: 40183 Thanks for the clarifications. For the slow link path, we don't have much option as the data transfer happens over the internet. I was trying to figure out the ways to reduce the gap as less as possible, for which I have read somewhere that we should have a sufficient value for max_wal_sender, and I was thinking that I can increase the data transfer happening by increasing the wal senders to gain some advantage. That is why, I asked that question. Thanks again. Regards, Parkirat Singh Bagga. -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Streaming-Replication-Master-Delta-Sync-tp5728704p5728713.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - admin mailing list archive at Nabble.com.