Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([98.129.198.125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPMmC-00017T-GV for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 00:18:52 +0000 Received: from sam.nabble.com ([216.139.236.26]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPMm7-000785-RJ for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 00:18:51 +0000 Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TPMm7-0000pb-Aa for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:18:47 -0700 Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:18:47 -0700 (PDT) From: teyking2003 To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Message-ID: <1350692327321-5729131.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1350547390079-5728767.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Database in psql MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Archive-Number: 201210/103 X-Sequence-Number: 40219 for the upgrade of psql version, do we need to reconfigure all again? -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Database-in-psql-tp5728767p5729131.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - admin mailing list archive at Nabble.com.