Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TloMH-0005ZE-DD for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:12:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TloMG-0004gH-Tw for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:12:52 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([87.238.57.229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TloMF-0004f7-E3 for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:12:51 +0000 Received: from nm31-vm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.229.47]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TloMD-0005Cl-4G for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:12:50 +0000 Received: from [98.138.90.56] by nm31.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Dec 2012 22:12:48 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.192] by tm9.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Dec 2012 22:12:48 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1050.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Dec 2012 22:12:48 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 7986.60434.bm@omp1050.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 95534 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Dec 2012 22:12:47 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1356041567; bh=sH6s28dK/gW9f3UjTjyDKMXIKEz+aVB59bOGYySZpL0=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fli8a0u12Ya1SM+QTN1XyRfLnjnIeViaeSxVRiacBKw7LyxjQnOVL73KL3ONrB53nYn3LcteMDpHy6dYoLIxa4mtc3fXCjAHUcLSep7aMhRR6bwycIhT8Hr56ILc4mmuM1048Gn9bPRCaqJdl47MpFBaVgqbjt+glLx50f9rweQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mOmeTZxomUFaJ21UYbZHmZ9cmDGX2STikh045o7eKcwYiYvZwyVvFzaKilC7wcf2s4Bj0q3Z8NqKZmvWd28VGCVrcnp1TfUb/rijLeyBRWCJupJ7jWsTWw6g9USkvmcxkmK6wGf7ttJC8+F3ZhIh3s6x6BEqBXCxUAO5CpSJimM=; X-YMail-OSG: Nk8PAZQVM1nyMJSGHrmP4Y1.VjKeVZOGzZVB9jAvYI5GjzK XT63vuFY46Iyn572J_myuCIZqd5SwB5MpicR6Hus5JKz4Y0u8N2S.uaRkBN4 gj1RIrxw1hGkBIcwDBQBm1Sf0HZ4nH7xl9GvHNTeLXBdSYCqLryuVgo9kZnc V1XWXGRKPHTHlHoJX9hmtZX552w_r2WDU_nHKp5CvkFQE4ofadnDmOnKt8A3 u5Ughfs6lunXCT0zMCXLCE6ktBjPjJgSJ9Dksn4JdLTBo89Jy3xYn7E4Z7x0 9BfBZdvR8i94uQRWTJxPky8KF9NkpBMHAawUcyuxf_mNz6EInWfl2yxezzlS 8kUhO3eYNUmjEY1r4rEWvywu_Xgr8O60Yb2_HQ9Eq9DAX73CvTAHdLAB5IPf PTKnsdhEZgyufyjvCM5AqJnAP.zu9KlWE_T_m2fTq47vAygG1._iK.Hwvjr_ qeRR1jy8AlGLRb8M5ZEmyWEpuA5UFig1.hZoQ_dnNkhJJzTiNEQDWcxLlxGI - Received: from [98.210.146.78] by web125902.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:12:47 PST X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001, UmFmYWVsIC0tCjwuLi4.CgoKPj4gIEhhcyBhbnlvbmUgZWxzZSBzZWVuIGFueXRoaW5nIGxpa2UgdGhpcyA_Cj4.IAo.IAo.IEhlbGxvCj4gCj4gVGhlIHJlbGVhc2Ugbm90ZXMgZm9yIDkuMi4yIHNheSB0aGlzOgo.IAo.ICIuLi4gSG93ZXZlciwgeW91IG1heSBuZWVkIHRvIHBlcmZvcm0gUkVJTkRFWCBvcGVyYXRpb25zIHRvIGNvcnJlY3QKPiBwcm9ibGVtcyBpbiBjb25jdXJyZW50bHktYnVpbHQgaW5kZXhlcywgYXMgZGVzY3JpYmVkIGluIHRoZSBmaXJzdAo.IGNoYW5nZWxvZyBpdGVtIGJlbG93Li4uLi4BMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.129.483 References: <1356001615.20304.YahooMailNeo@web125905.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <50D3187D.1060309@usit.uio.no> Message-ID: <1356041567.95527.YahooMailNeo@web125902.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:12:47 -0800 (PST) From: Greg Williamson Reply-To: Greg Williamson Subject: Re: Upgrade from 9.1.6 to 9, 1.7 seems to have caused a major slowdown Cc: "pgsql-admin@postgresql.org" In-Reply-To: <50D3187D.1060309@usit.uio.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Pg-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org Rafael -- <...> >> Has anyone else seen anything like this ? >> > > Hello > > The release notes for 9.2.2 say this: > > "... However, you may need to perform REINDEX operations to correct > problems in concurrently-built indexes, as described in the first > changelog item below....." > > But the 9.1.7 note says nothing about this, even when this version has > the same patch for 'CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY' as 9.2.2 > > Why don't you try to reindex the indexes in your database and see it > this helps? > > regards, > - -- > Rafael Martinez Guerrero Thanks for the suggestion -- I did indeed a lot of time on checking indexes. But of course it was not postgres at all, just servers that hadn't dealt well with the brief outage. The upgraded instance is performing just as expected. Thanks & sorry for wasting time of the list, wee hours of the morning and a sense of desperation. GW -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin