Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.208.211])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47352633119
	for <pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed,  3 Mar 2010 14:34:11 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 61118-01-4
	for <pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed,  3 Mar 2010 18:33:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D6F63377C
	for <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>; Wed,  3 Mar 2010 14:33:15 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o23IXCiQ014354;
	Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:33:12 -0500 (EST)
To: Dhimant Patel <drp4kri@gmail.com>
cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: --with-wal-segsize in-effective? 
In-reply-to: <f3e51c11003031001p2812f739ifb766aec3e017d5a@mail.gmail.com> 
References: <f3e51c11003030932g4a12e1c7u4d5852f0b7cde0e8@mail.gmail.com>
	<f3e51c11003031001p2812f739ifb766aec3e017d5a@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Dhimant Patel <drp4kri@gmail.com>
	message dated "Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:01:08 -0500"
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:33:12 -0500
Message-ID: <14353.1267641192@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.154 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=-1.155,
	BAYES_50=0.001
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201003/35
X-Sequence-Number: 33834

Dhimant Patel <drp4kri@gmail.com> writes:
> --with-wal-segsize=2 as per documentation should give me 4MB size segment, I
> am getting it of 2MB.

Not sure what part of the documentation you're reading, but what I'm
looking at says the size is specified in megabytes.  So that behavior
seems correct to me.

			regards, tom lane