Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33629634F1B for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 17:47:42 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00474-08 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 21:47:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252EF634A5A for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 17:47:30 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o12LlHO3001483; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:47:17 -0500 (EST) To: Mark Corner cc: Bruce Momjian , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Devrim_G=DCND=DCZ?= , pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Using pg_migrator to upgrade 8.3->8.4 In-reply-to: <4F50A437-443C-40B9-BFB6-C279ADE9BE97@gmail.com> References: <201002022036.o12KaxO02406@momjian.us> <4F50A437-443C-40B9-BFB6-C279ADE9BE97@gmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to Mark Corner message dated "Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:39:17 -0500" Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:47:17 -0500 Message-ID: <1482.1265147237@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.465 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=0.134, BAYES_00=-2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201002/28 X-Sequence-Number: 33631 Mark Corner writes: > Yep, O will go down that road if I am not duplicating any work. In my experience building RPMS from SRPMS rarely just "works" :) Really? It's supposed to. At least at Red Hat, the RPMs *are* built from the SRPMs, nothing behind the curtain. In recent releases they're even built in a minimally-loaded chroot to ensure that there are not any missing BuildRequires: (which did use to be a hazard). regards, tom lane