Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([2a02:16a8:dc51::56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fueKC-0001JR-1o for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 13:46:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fueK9-0000CI-Li for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 13:46:25 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <066ce286@free.fr>) id 1fueJu-0007QI-At for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 13:46:10 +0000 Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr ([2a01:e0c:1:1599::10]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <066ce286@free.fr>) id 1fueJq-0006rp-A1 for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 13:46:08 +0000 Received: from zimbra82-e14.priv.proxad.net (unknown [172.20.243.235]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617AEB0055A; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 15:46:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 15:46:02 +0200 (CEST) From: 066ce286@free.fr To: wambacher@posteo.de Cc: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org Message-ID: <1495817175.367327613.1535463961983.JavaMail.root@zimbra82-e14.priv.proxad.net> In-Reply-To: <84c2baff-89e3-931f-232a-f6ca832eb364@posteo.de> Subject: Re: tuple concurrently updated MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [2a01:e35:2434:2250:8c8e:8d27:9c28:8ea3] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.2.0-GA2598 (ZimbraWebClient - GC68 (Linux)/7.2.0-GA2598) X-Authenticated-User: 066ce286@free.fr List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk AAMOF, what are your fsync/wal_sync_method parameters, and what is your sto= rage hardware ? ----- Mail original ----- De: wambacher@posteo.de =C3=80: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org Envoy=C3=A9: Mardi 28 Ao=C3=BBt 2018 15:38:37 Objet: Re: tuple concurrently updated so do i :( but i will try it. in parall the preperations for a full import are running. e.g the download will need 2 hours. walter Am 28.08.2018 um 15:34 schrieb 066ce286@free.fr: > I don't think a vacuum can handle what a pg_dump can't. But I'm maybe wro= ng. >