Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-admin-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1eP5Ia-0004VY-73
	for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:34:04 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-admin-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1eP5IZ-0006xI-LD
	for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:34:03 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <pinker@onet.eu>)
	id 1eP5IZ-0006x0-EW
	for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:34:03 +0000
Received: from n3.nabble.com ([162.255.23.22])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <pinker@onet.eu>)
	id 1eP5IW-0005DS-Bp
	for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:34:02 +0000
Received: from n3.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by n3.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3474EA0AB2AF
	for <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 04:33:57 -0700 (MST)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 04:33:57 -0700 (MST)
From: pinker <pinker@onet.eu>
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Message-ID: <1513164837170-0.post@n3.nabble.com>
Subject: pg_upgrade --link from 9.4 to 10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: <pgsql-admin.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-admin>
Precedence: bulk

Hi,
just wanted to make sure if upgrade from 9.4 to 10 using pg_upgrade -k (so
the hard links) is supported?



--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-admin-f2076596.html