Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRGvg-0002dM-Su for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:23:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRGvg-0002WT-GB for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:23:28 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRGvg-0002WJ-60 for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:23:28 +0000 Received: from mx1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.212]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eRGvX-0002cI-7v for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:23:26 +0000 Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [80.241.60.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6735D47259; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:23:13 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.241]) by gerste.heinlein-support.de (gerste.heinlein-support.de [91.198.250.173]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id 7y-0oDlu2w-Z; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:23:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1513686184.2428.3.camel@cybertec.at> Subject: Re: WG: Extension using the current connection handle From: Laurenz Albe To: "Brandl, Wolfgang" , "pgsql-admin@postgresql.org" Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:23:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Cybertec Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Wolfgang Brandl wrote: > Thanks for the Tipp with the SPI. > We are not using oracle_fdw, becaue we got somehow problems with the connection. > Therefore some of the transactions get lost and all following didn't get a connection. > We did not analyse this. Normally, oracle_fdw re-establishes lost connections, so you get at most one error, and the next statement works again. Yours, Laurenz Albe