Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gedGK-00074A-DI for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 09:56:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gedGH-0007n9-Qz for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 09:56:29 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gedGH-0007n2-G4 for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 09:56:29 +0000 Received: from n3.nabble.com ([162.255.23.22]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gedGA-0007GU-IE for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 09:56:28 +0000 Received: from n3.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n3.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381CA112B8117 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 02:56:21 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 02:56:21 -0700 (MST) From: rajan To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Message-ID: <1546422981227-0.post@n3.nabble.com> Subject: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utility process may go down? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background process may go down? meaning the process getting stopped? For example, can the wal sender process alone stop working? If it does so, which part of the logs I must check to proceed further. ----- -- Thanks, Rajan. -- Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-admin-f2076596.html