Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1geuvJ-0002Qk-H5 for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 04:48:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1geuvH-0000Vx-H4 for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 04:47:59 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1geuvH-0000Vq-9g for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 04:47:59 +0000 Received: from n3.nabble.com ([162.255.23.22]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1geuvE-0007wx-ET for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 04:47:58 +0000 Received: from n3.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n3.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE651112FA2B2 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 21:47:54 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 21:47:54 -0700 (MST) From: rajan To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Message-ID: <1546490874712-0.post@n3.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <31952.1546444240@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <1546422981227-0.post@n3.nabble.com> <1546424883710-0.post@n3.nabble.com> <31952.1546444240@sss.pgh.pa.us> Subject: Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utility process may go down? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Ok. Let me explain my use case from where I am asking this question, For configuring Postgres Monitoring using a tool, Is it enough if I just add the Postmaster process alone for Monitoring? or Should I add all background processes for Monitoring? ----- -- Thanks, Rajan. -- Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-admin-f2076596.html