Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of cmdrclueless@gmail.com designates
	10.236.77.102 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.77.102;
References: <EB254343-461B-4B6B-93A1-3065BA902CF3@gmail.com>
	<4F4820C8.2000703@iii.com>
	<CAAhXZGv+sU3SksPi-hn2GECf2O_-Xt-xBANgCJyuWDwFiUDnAQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1330183903.2593.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <1330183903.2593.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Message-Id: <17919563-C079-438C-9702-5A0806127DFD@gmail.com>
Cc: "pgsql-admin@postgresql.org" <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
From: Brian Weaver <cmdrclueless@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Problems with pg_restore (plpgsql already exists)
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:18:24 -0500
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>

Guillaume,=20

Thanks for the pointer. Is it just me that finds it the behavior of pg_resto=
re odd? If the default installation since 9.0 has PL/PgSQL installed then wh=
y does pg_restore still emit statements to create the language? As a develop=
er by trade it smells like a bug.=20

-- Brian

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 25, 2012, at 10:31, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:=


> On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 22:12 -0500, Brian Weaver wrote:
>> So when did the installation of PL/PgSQL into all databases become standa=
rd
>> operating procedure? It wasn't standard (or at least it didn't choke) on
>> the installation of versions 8.3 and 8.4 that I have used on CentOS 5.
>>=20
>> Seems like a fairly substantial change. Did I miss it in the release note=
s?
>>=20
>=20
> Since 9.0, it's the third item in the overview list of the release notes
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/release-9-0.html.
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Guillaume
> http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
> http://www.dalibo.com
>=20