Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YqnV1-0002aP-41 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 18:59:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YqnV0-0007yn-FI for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 18:59:50 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YqnUz-0007yg-7g for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 18:59:49 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YqnUs-0003rF-Jb for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 18:59:47 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t48IxM8I018314; Fri, 8 May 2015 14:59:22 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andres Freund cc: Peter Geoghegan , Heikki Linnakangas , Jeff Janes , Stephen Frost , Dean Rasheed , Bruce Momjian , Pg Hackers Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 In-reply-to: <20150508183504.GU12950@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <20150508150340.GJ12950@alap3.anarazel.de> <9096.1431102730@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20150508165246.GO12950@alap3.anarazel.de> <10633.1431105922@sss.pgh.pa.us> <554CF44B.3080808@iki.fi> <20150508180636.GR12950@alap3.anarazel.de> <20150508181445.GS12950@alap3.anarazel.de> <17473.1431109846@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20150508183504.GU12950@alap3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund message dated "Fri, 08 May 2015 20:35:04 +0200" Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 14:59:22 -0400 Message-ID: <18313.1431111562@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Andres Freund writes: > I think Peter (on IM) just found a more likely explanation than mine. > index_close(idxRel, NoLock); > heap_close(relation, NoLock); > candidates = lappend_oid(candidates, idxForm->indexrelid); > ... > Yes. idxForm points into idxRel->rd_index. Ooops. But shouldn't that have failed 100% of the time in a CCA build? Or is the candidates list fairly noncritical? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers