Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VyrNP-00044t-7K for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 23:08:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VyrNO-0005eR-Ll for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 23:08:30 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:7903:4::125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VyrNN-0005cj-0q for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 23:08:29 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VyrNK-0008RD-SF for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 23:08:28 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s02N8Pbh019020; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 18:08:25 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Caleb Access cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: failures in pg_restore -- possibly corrupt archive In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Caleb Access message dated "Thu, 02 Jan 2014 15:55:10 -0700" Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 18:08:25 -0500 Message-ID: <19019.1388704105@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org Caleb Access writes: > The pg_dump and pg_restore look to be the same version on both boxes ( > 9.1.8 ). Hm, the bug fixes I was thinking of are all older than that, so if it's a pg_dump or pg_restore bug then it's something previously unreported. It'd likely be useful to try running pg_restore with -v to track what it's doing. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin