From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com>
cc: "pgsql-admin@postgresql.org" <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: building 9.6.1 with a different value for krb-srvnam
In-reply-to: 
 <CABzCKRDiCF1KLq0X33pCBLXJhcSrQfx5NotDe3-bXt_ABNsoog@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CABzCKRDiCF1KLq0X33pCBLXJhcSrQfx5NotDe3-bXt_ABNsoog@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com>
	message dated "Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:19:44 -0500"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <19199.1485897503.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:18:23 -0500
Message-ID: <19200.1485897503@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org

John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com> writes:
> Quick question. I just built a new edition of 9.6.1 using
> --with-krb-srvnam=POSTGRES in my configure line. Everything seemed to build
> properly, however, after installation, I ran pg_config and the line for
> CONFIGURE shows every option I used except --with-krb-srvnam, So, I'm
> wondering if the new setting actually made it in there, i.e., it did not,
> or I just found a bug in pg_config.

Hm, worksforme.  Are you sure you're checking the right copy of pg_config?

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin