Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fATIUkm89157 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:30:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fATIUZk19568; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:30:35 -0500 (EST) To: bangh cc: "'pgsql-admin@postgresql.org'" Subject: Re: Vacuum In-reply-to: <3C065CEA.B23D9745@baileylink.net> References: <20011127085555.A20745-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com> <3C04A23E.BF409D74@answare.fr> <2131.1006960265@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3C0510FF.694D34EA@answare.fr> <2528.1006965329@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3C051482.908DEDFF@answare.fr> <2775.1006967609@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3C05F979.ED76D96D@answare.fr> <18157.1007043873@sss.pgh.pa.us> <18448.1007046370@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3C065CEA.B23D9745@baileylink.net> Comments: In-reply-to bangh message dated "Thu, 29 Nov 2001 10:06:02 -0600" Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:30:35 -0500 Message-ID: <19565.1007058635@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200111/176 X-Sequence-Number: 2701 bangh writes: > However I noticed the index grows also very fast. Does anyone have a way to > compress the index? REINDEX, or just drop and recreate the indexes. regards, tom lane